National Park Biologist Challenges Dismissal Over Flag Display

A National Park Service biologist, Shannon Joslin, encountered controversy after involvement in a display featuring the transgender flag at El Capitan in May 2025. Joslin, who identifies with “they/them” pronouns, claimed wrongful termination, alleging their free speech was infringed upon as a result of the display.

In a lawsuit filed in February 2026 against various government entities, Joslin sought reinstatement, legal validation against the termination, protection from potential criminal charges, and financial compensation. They argued these actions were in retaliation to an off-duty, peaceful expression of support.

Last Friday, a federal judge dismissed Joslin’s case. The court stated it lacked the authority to mandate the National Park Service to reinstate Joslin but did not resolve the wider disagreement about the dismissal. U.S. District Judge Jennifer L. Thurston noted improper procedural use by Joslin to contest their firing.

Joslin, acting as a “private citizen” at the time, displayed the flag during their personal time. Following this, a Park Service law enforcement officer informed Joslin of a criminal investigation related to the flag display. It was soon after that Yosemite’s acting deputy superintendent issued a termination notice.

The court documents showed Joslin was nearing completion of a two-year trial period when the dismissal was executed. The employer cited that Joslin did not adhere to conduct expectations during this period by participating in an event without the necessary permit, thereby violating park rules.

Joslin later received a form referencing a presidential executive order and unspecified “unacceptable conduct,” as noted in the legal ruling. The controversy fueled online discussions after Joslin voiced their predicament on social media, highlighting their professional conduct record and the desire to reclaim their position and rights.

Judge Thurston mentioned that Joslin can seek recourse through the Civil Service Reform Act, designed to shield federal employees from unjust practices and political retaliation. In December 2025, Joslin initiated such efforts by lodging a complaint with the U.S. Office of Special Counsel, contending the termination as a “prohibited personnel practice.”

Joslin emphasized that their situation is not solely about their own experience but raises questions about the broader right to free expression in the United States. They argued this case could impact all civil servants and, essentially, all Americans.

The Office of Special Counsel has until August 3 to respond to Joslin’s complaint. Yet, due to a government shutdown and case backlog, a delayed response is anticipated.