At the Aspire Houston Fertility Institute, smaller cryo storage containers hold approximately 150 egg samples each in liquid nitrogen within a secured storage area. This is part of the in vitro fertilization lab’s operations as of February 27, 2024, in Houston.
In early February, Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez from New York highlighted the challenges faced by women who plan to have children later in life. Her focus was on those who delay parenthood due to professional ambitions, not finding a suitable partner, or lacking emotional and financial readiness. By choosing to freeze her eggs, and sharing her journey on Instagram, Ocasio-Cortez shed light on this option’s significance for many women.
As more women opt for extended education and delay starting families, egg freezing provides a potential solution for biological motherhood later in life. Research consistently shows the difficulty of pregnancy and carrying a child to term increases as women age.
Despite her status as a Congress member, Ocasio-Cortez faces similar challenges as most American women regarding health insurance and fertility coverage. Her congressional medical insurance excludes egg freezing, necessitating out-of-pocket expenses, which she estimates at $10,000. Many U.S. women with private insurance also lack coverage for egg freezing, with insurers often requiring state mandates to include such costly provisions.
In states where egg freezing coverage exists, it usually accompanies medical treatments affecting ovulation, like chemotherapy. Elective egg freezing remains largely uncovered by private insurers. Medicaid offers no support for egg freezing, leaving low-income women, unlike Ocasio-Cortez, without financial means to pursue this option.
This disparity in family planning shows asymmetry within U.S. policies. While contraceptive supplies and services are broadly covered by private and public health plans, support for choosing the timing of childbearing is scant. Low-income individuals have access to free contraceptive options through Medicaid and programs like Title X.
Despite this, assistance for timing childbearing remains lacking. Family planning in the U.S. prioritizes limiting births without supporting those who wish to have children.
Demographic data indicating a decades-long decline in U.S. births demands attention. Predictions suggest population growth may halt by the mid-2050s, potentially leading to a decrease. This demographic shift could impact economic growth and military strength, also threatening the Social Security program by reducing young workers.
The U.S. must consider comprehensive family planning policies promoting population growth alongside fertility control. Current policies largely focus on birth control without recognizing birth promotion’s importance.
Leonard M. Lopoo, holding the Paul Volcker Chair in Behavioral Economics at Syracuse University’s Maxwell School, emphasizes these issues in his book, “Wanting Children: Family-Planning Policies and the Engineering of America’s Population.”
Copyright 2026 Nexstar Media Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Increased Funding Needed for Psychiatric Hospitals
Trump Administration Distributes ACA Refund Checks
Higher Consumption of Ultra-Processed Foods Linked to Increased Health Risks
Understanding Inflammation: Myths and Facts
Calm Parenting: Strategies to Manage Stress
Trump’s Executive Order to Combat Mosquitoes and Ticks in D.C.