Charles Spencer’s Shocking Claim

Charles Spencer, the 9th Earl of Spencer, unveils a startling claim in his latest book, Swan Song: Diana, My Sister, regarding Princess Diana’s divorce from Prince Charles. Spencer states that Diana revealed her decision to divorce was prompted by discovering an alleged affair between Charles and his valet.

Spencer’s Account of Diana’s Revelation

In an excerpt published by the Daily Mail, Spencer recounts a moment in the 1990s when Diana confided in him during lunch at a London restaurant. She declared her intention to divorce and revealed her rationale, quoting, “But my husband is in love with his valet.” Spencer briefly highlights this revelation before focusing more intensely on his conversations with Prince Charles after Diana’s tragic death in 1997.

Allegations and Defense

“Anyone who knows the Prince of Wales at all would appreciate that the allegation is totally ludicrous and, indeed, risible.” – Sir Michael Peat

The text explores the rumors surrounding Charles and his valet, Michael Fawcett. These accusations trace back to George Smith, another valet, who, amid a mental breakdown in the 2000s, claimed to have witnessed misconduct involving Charles. These claims sparked speculation, but investigations found no evidence of misconduct.

Controversy Surrounding Spencer’s Book

Spencer’s book elicits varied reactions, with some questioning the timing of these allegations. Critics like broadcaster Piers Morgan express surprise and concern over Spencer’s intentions, suggesting potential harm to Charles’ reputation. This skepticism is echoed by others who dismiss the claims as attempts to sensationalize for financial gain.

Historical Context and Palace’s Reaction

Spencer’s narrative includes details of interactions with Charles following Diana’s death. He recalls a contentious dispute about the involvement of William and Harry in the funeral procession. Buckingham Palace addresses Spencer’s allegations with a statement on grief’s impact on memory and reason, seemingly dismissing Spencer’s claims as unfounded and highlighting the controversial nature of his account.