Concerns Over Todd Blanche’s Confirmation as Attorney General

Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche appeared before the Senate Judiciary Committee at Capitol Hill in Washington on Wednesday, July 15, 2026. The confirmation hearing raised serious concerns about his capability and independence from former President Trump. Sen. Alex Padilla questioned Blanche about handling potential compensation claims by pardoned defendants from the January 6 Capitol riot. Blanche’s claim that cases are always vigorously defended was brought into question, especially concerning Trump’s interests.

The issue stemmed from a $1.776 billion ‘anti-weaponization’ fund, developed following a $10 billion lawsuit by Trump. Trump claimed the government had improperly released his tax information. Blanche settled the case, preventing the government from prosecuting or pursuing claims against Trump. This settlement effectively granted Trump a self-pardon, though it was never properly defended in court.

The judge in the case criticized the Department of Justice for failing to uphold its responsibilities. The decision to settle was seen as bypassing department policies and setting a dangerous precedent. This matter should be reported to the New York State Bar, with Blanche potentially facing disciplinary actions.

During his confirmation, many questions arose about the settlement. The core issue highlighted was Blanche’s willingness to settle rather than defend. The role of attorney general requires independence from the president and the capacity to say ‘No’ when necessary. Historical examples include Attorney General John Ashcroft refusing a secret surveillance program and Jeff Sessions defending the department’s independence.

Blanche’s inability to stand up to Trump indicates a lack of the necessary ethical backbone for the role. He mistakenly referred to himself as ‘Trump’s lawyer’ during questioning by Sen. John Kennedy, a slip revealing his true allegiance.

The desire to appoint Blanche seems personal on Trump’s part, but Republican senators should reconsider his confirmation. There are 21 Republican lawyers in the Senate, all aware of Blanche’s unsuitability. The attorney general’s duty is to defend the rule of law, not serve presidential ends. Confirming Blanche would reflect poorly on Senate Republicans and prompt critical examination come November elections.

Chris Truax, an appellate attorney and charter member of the Society for the Rule of Law, casts doubt on the wisdom of confirming Blanche as attorney general.