Senators Challenge Trump Administration’s Warning Signs Directive at Smithsonian Museum

Request for Explanation

Two senators have urged the Trump administration to clarify its proposal to place warning signs outside the National Museum of American History. Senators Lisa Murkowski from Alaska and Jeff Merkley from Oregon directed their inquiries to Interior Secretary Doug Burgum. This action follows an executive order from President Trump, aimed at addressing the museum’s exhibits.

In their correspondence, Murkowski, who chairs the Senate Appropriations Subcommittee on Interior, and Merkley, the subcommittee’s ranking member, questioned the involvement of the National Park Service (NPS) in this initiative. They also demanded details on the allocation of taxpayer funds for the project.

The Smithsonian Institution has spent 180 years presenting objective historical evidence, not political narratives, through its research and education.
There is nothing more American than telling our story truthfully.
— Senators Murkowski and Merkley in their letter

Newsweek attempted to gather further responses from the White House, the Department of the Interior, and the two senators.

Debate Over Historical Presentation

The issue underlines a larger discussion about how American history is portrayed in federally supported institutions. President Trump’s July executive order, titled Restoring Trust in the Smithsonian Institution, claims museum exhibits focus excessively on social justice issues, neglecting national achievements.

The administration accuses Smithsonian leadership of advancing ideological agendas. The proposed directive would place signs on NPS-managed areas near the museum to warn visitors of alleged inaccuracies and suggest alternative information sources. The order follows a 162-page report by the White House Domestic Policy Council, released on July 4, titled Saving America’s Story.

White House Report Findings

The Trump administration accused the museum of prioritizing ideological activism over historical integrity. It claims the focus on issues like race, gender, and inequality distorts the country’s history. The report suggests revising exhibits considered biased and increasing recognition of historical national achievements, especially during America’s 250th anniversary.

Recommendations include signage stating that exhibits were developed by individuals critical of America and increasing focus on the 56 Declaration of Independence signers. The White House highlighted its findings on social media, citing examples of alleged political activism in the museum’s presentations.

Specific Criticisms

The report targeted several exhibits, including the Girlhood (It’s Complicated) display, arguing its focus on gender identity reflects activism. Republicans questioned this during congressional hearings. The administration also faulted insufficient recognition of the Declaration of Independence during the semi-quincentennial celebratory events.

Museum Director Anthea Hartig has countered these claims, asserting the museum relies on rigorous scholarship while showcasing both America’s successes and failures.

Request for Additional Information

Executive Order 14416 requires several officials to implement proposed signage, referencing the July 4 report. Senators Murkowski and Merkley requested additional details:

• Proposed sign numbers, sizes, and locations
• Content and production costs
• Funding source within the Department of the Interior
• Federal employee roles in executing the directive
• NPS land use precedents for addressing scholarly work
• Criteria for accurate information and public involvement
• Duration of the temporary signage

Murkowski has been critical of Trump’s administration in the past, notably voting to convict him during his impeachment trial. Recently, she announced her opposition to Trump’s attorney general nominee, expressing concern over Justice Department politicization.