On Thursday morning, dozens of demonstrators gathered at Memorial Circle in Washington, D.C. They protested President Trump’s proposed 250-foot-tall arch planned to stand on the bridge linking the National Mall to Arlington National Cemetery.
Among the protesters were veterans, retirees, and lawmakers. They expressed concerns about the arch’s scale, cost, and lack of Congressional approval. The arch was criticized for potentially overshadowing Arlington National Cemetery.
“It’s the wrong monument, in the wrong place, at the wrong time, dedicated to the wrong man,” said Jon Gundersen, a retired Army veteran involved in a lawsuit against the Trump administration over the arch.
Public Citizen organized the protest, named “Vets over Vanity.” Speakers emphasized the inappropriate nature of the arch. For instance, Sen. Tammy Duckworth, D-Ill., expressed her frustration with the monument’s potential impact on the cemetery.
The White House stated that the arch would enhance the visitor experience at the cemetery and serve as a reminder of American heroes’ sacrifices. Protesters, however, argued that funds would be better spent on improving veterans’ services.
Protesters gathered near a tarp mockup of the proposed arch, which would be 32 times its size. They expressed outrage at the notion of tourists viewing Arlington’s funerals beneath the arch.
Concerns about aviation safety were also raised. Rep. Don Beyer, D-Va., questioned the decision to house military drones and snipers in the structure.
Neither the White House, the Department of Interior, nor the Federal Aviation Administration responded to inquiries about the project’s specifics. Despite legal challenges, the proposal is moving towards federal approval.
The National Capital Planning Commission is expected to review the project in early November. The National Park Service’s earlier negotiations with external groups on minimizing harm were halted in September.
Charles Birnbaum from The Cultural Landscape Foundation criticized the abrupt termination of the review process. Single-party recommendations bypassing negotiation, he argued, weaken protection for historic sites.
Additionally, a bipartisan permitting reform bill in Congress might reduce protections further. Efforts by Sen. Jeff Merkley, D-Ore., to block federal funding for the project faced opposition.
Protesters vowed to continue opposing the project. Julius D. Spain Sr., from the Arlington County Board, urged continued communication with Congress members.
There is potential for Congress to block funding for the arch. Midterm elections might alter the political landscape and affect the project’s future.

Republicans Boost Spending in Ohio Senate Race Amid Growing Concerns
Kushner Criticizes CNN Article Over Claims of Conflict of Interest
Debate Urged in Texas Senate Race as Paxton Faces Criticism
Mayor Mamdani Responds to Netanyahu’s United Nations Speech
Iowa Senate Race: Attendance Records in Focus as Hinson and Turek Square Off
Justice Alito Discusses Supreme Court Decisions and Criticism