Trump’s Proposal for Syria to Handle Hezbollah Raises Regional Concerns

The White House’s stance on Israel’s conflict with Hezbollah in Lebanon has shifted. U.S. President Donald Trump suggested an alternative approach: allowing Syria to engage Hezbollah. Trump believes Syria’s insurgents, who toppled former President Bashar Assad and formed a new government, could more effectively address Hezbollah than the Israeli military.

Syrian President Ahmad al-Sharaa, however, expressed disinterest in this proposal. He claimed Trump’s comments were misunderstood, yet Trump remained firm on his suggestion. The idea of Syria invading Lebanon has caused unease both in Lebanon and Israel. Israel, wary of al-Sharaa’s Islamist-led government, currently controls a part of southern Syria since his rise to power.

Tensions have also escalated between Israel and Turkey, a major supporter of al-Sharaa’s government. Both countries are vying for influence in Syria. Israeli top security officials discussed these developments in a recent closed-door meeting, emphasizing the potential risks involved.

Trump’s Displeasure with the Israel-Hezbollah Conflict

During the G7 summit, Trump voiced concerns about Israel’s prolonged war with Hezbollah. He highlighted the high civilian casualties, noting that more than 4,000 have died due to Israeli strikes in Lebanon. Trump’s proposal for Syria’s involvement stems from his belief that Syria might handle Hezbollah more efficiently. Fox News’ Trey Yingst reported Trump’s disappointment in Israel’s inability to neutralize Hezbollah, suggesting Syria as a potential solution.

Syria Denies War Plans in Lebanon

Syria’s response to Trump’s remarks focused on peace and regional stability. In a speech, al-Sharaa dismissed rumors of Syrian intervention in Lebanon, emphasizing Syria’s commitment to a peaceful resolution. He highlighted Syria’s intention to end conflict and enhance economic ties with Lebanon.

In an interview with Al Mashhad, al-Sharaa explained that Trump’s comments about Syria’s role were misinterpreted. Syria aims to resolve issues collaboratively, addressing the challenges affecting both Syria and Lebanon without direct military involvement.

Syria’s Position on Hezbollah and Regional Conflict

The current Syrian regime, which came to power in December 2024, has focused on rebuilding without seeking conflict. Despite Hezbollah and Iran’s past support for Assad during Syria’s civil war, al-Sharaa’s government prefers to remain uninvolved in regional conflicts.

When Israel and the U.S. began their offensive against Iran, Syria stayed neutral. Early in the conflict, Syria fortified its border with Lebanon to prevent spillover and smuggling. Tensions with Hezbollah were briefly heightened when Syria accused them of shelling Syrian army positions.

Concerns Over Syria’s Historical Role in Lebanon

Trump’s proposal has reignited fears related to past sectarian conflicts and Syrian occupation of Lebanon. Randa Slim of the Stimson Center criticized Trump’s idea, emphasizing Syria’s focus on rebuilding and addressing internal challenges.

After Assad’s fall, sectarian violence linked to Syria’s new government created concerns about potential cross-border violence. Lebanon’s memories of Syrian occupation further complicate the situation.

Israel is vigilant of potential Syrian influence in Lebanese politics, although its primary concern remains Hezbollah.

Contributions from Melanie Lidman in Tel Aviv and Michelle L. Price in Washington were included.