Senator Bernie Sanders and Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez presented the Artificial Intelligence Data Center Moratorium Act at a news conference in Washington. Despite the miles between Arizona and Pennsylvania, these states share growing concerns regarding new data center developments. This sentiment crosses party lines and reflects a broader skepticism about large investments and new technologies.
Many officials and activists worry about rapid economic changes. However, with the election season underway, assessing public policy tradeoffs is more challenging. Various organizations have aimed to educate and engage stakeholders and the public but often face obstacles, including misinformation.
In Pennsylvania, the Chamber of Business and Industry issued a satirical “No Technology Pledge” challenging opponents of data centers to forego the digital services reliant on them. Similarly, the Arizona Chamber of Commerce proposed an “Offline Pledge.” These initiatives, while jesting, highlight the inconsistency of opposing data center development while using its benefits.
Without expanding data center infrastructure, the demand for such services remains. Other states or countries might embrace these opportunities, potentially shifting critical investment and innovation away from the U.S. Given the link between technological advancement and economic and national security, resisting digital infrastructure investment is risky.
This does not imply that data centers should be built uncritically. Communities should scrutinize projects affecting them. Clear communication about water use, energy consumption, noise, and economic benefits from developers is essential. Transparency can dispel suspicions and foster trust.
Artificial intelligence concerns are valid, but focusing solely on AI overlooks the broader role of data centers. These centers are integral to commerce, banking, health care, transportation, and communications. Many criticisms fail to account for industry advancements such as more efficient cooling technologies and closed-loop systems. Regulators are collaborating with utilities to manage power demands responsibly.
Addressing concerns should not overshadow recognizing solutions and benefits. Data centers entail significant private investments and generate tax revenue, supporting public services like schools and emergency services. Effective policies should balance innovation with community interests. Engaging in open dialogue about development is crucial.
While the pledges by Seiden and Bernstein may not be practical, neither are the suggested data center moratoria.
Danny Seiden is the president and CEO of the Arizona Chamber of Commerce and Industry. Luke Bernstein is the president and CEO of the Pennsylvania Chamber of Business and Industry.

Concerns Over Russia’s Biological Weapons Program
Police Take Down Teenage-Led Ransomware Group KillSec
Concerns Arise Over ChatGPT for Teens
Former OpenAI Researchers Challenge Dismissals
AI and Human Connection: Hy’s Innovative Approach
OpenAI Exposes Russian and Iranian Influence Operations Using AI