Criticism of U.S. Hosting the 2026 FIFA World Cup

The 2026 FIFA World Cup is taking place, with Canada, the United States, and Mexico sharing hosting duties for the 48-team event. As of Thursday afternoon, only one match has concluded. Mexico defeated South Africa 2-0 at Estadio Azteca in Mexico City.

Despite the excitement, there are criticisms from some media outlets. These critiques suggest the United States has, in some ways, already lost. One columnist, Nancy Armour from USA Today, argues that the U.S. projects a negative image, regardless of the tournament’s outcomes on the field.

Armour writes that even if the U.S. Men’s National Team performs well, the country will still be viewed as “hateful and greedy.” She believes the leadership wants to see the world in a certain way, prioritizing profits over genuine sportsmanship and inclusivity.

“This is a once-in-a-generation opportunity to showcase the best of the United States and embrace the joy that soccer brings the rest of the world and, instead, we chose to be ugly Americans.” – Nancy Armour

Armour attributes part of this critique to former President Donald Trump. She criticizes the treatment of the Iranian National Team and Somali referee Omar Artan, who faced challenges entering the U.S. She argues that the U.S., as a host, should avoid exclusionary practices.

On ticket pricing, Armour points out that the high costs limit accessibility. However, she notes that these prices are set by FIFA, not influenced by the U.S. government.

Armour’s criticism stems from dissatisfaction with U.S. leadership and policies. She references historical comparisons to Qatar’s hosting of the 2022 World Cup, criticizing both nations but asserting that comparing them is misguided.

Despite her criticisms, U.S. supporters and officials believe the country will succeed as hosts. This debate highlights differing perspectives on globalization, sportsmanship, and national representation.