The recent $1.2 billion fine against Bank of America highlights significant challenges in the financial industry regarding money laundering and sanctions evasion. The fine sheds light on fundamental weaknesses in how financial institutions address financial crimes.
Key Failures
Bank of America experienced notable failures, such as failing to identify and report over a billion dollars in suspicious activity linked to national security. Additionally, 76% of its risk factor weights in its transaction monitoring system remained unchanged for five years. When changes occurred, about 80% of them decreased, revealing a lack of adaptation to changing threats.
Operational Compliance vs. National Security
The financial sector often views money laundering as a compliance issue, focusing on pattern matching and sanction list checks. While necessary, this approach overlooks the national security risks tied to financial crimes. Not all crimes have equal national security implications; distinctions must be made to address higher risks effectively.
The Geopolitical Context
Financial crimes need to be understood within the broader geopolitical framework of American national security and foreign policy. For instance, the Iran War strategy prioritizes economic warfare, aiming to curb Iran’s sanction evasion. Missing these activities can have significant consequences for American foreign policy goals.
Adaptation in a Changing Environment
From 2018 to 2023, global changes, such as Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, highlighted the need for banks to adjust risk assessment. However, Bank of America left most of its risk weights unchanged during this period, showing institutional complacency. Proper understanding of financial crime risks requires geopolitical awareness among finance professionals.
Essential Financial Crime Education
The Association of Certified Anti-Money Laundering Specialists reports ongoing training as a significant challenge. In global reports, over 40% of professionals from 2024 to 2026 identified skill deficiency as a high risk. Additionally, 63% in 2026 flagged geopolitical instability as a high risk. The industry recognizes the need for improved expertise to tackle these threats effectively.
The Path Forward
Professionals need education on how national security and foreign policy shape financial crime priorities. Regulatory training is essential, but institutions must train staff to understand illicit finance beyond checklists. Leadership must commit to dynamic learning approaches, adapting to rapidly changing risks.
Conclusion
Financial institutions need to evolve beyond compliance. Effective financial crime prevention requires understanding that these crimes pose global safety risks. Companies must cultivate staff capable of addressing complex threats. The sector needs a comprehensive educational overhaul to adapt and safeguard national interests.
Brett Erickson, managing principal at Obsidian Risk Advisors, serves on the advisory boards of Seton Hall School of Diplomacy and International Relations and DePaul University Driehaus College of Business.
© 2026 Nexstar Media Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.