Journalists often focus on national leaders, who guide their country’s actions and must be accountable. However, the individuals executing their plans are equally crucial. In autocratic regimes, where state actions can involve intimidation or worse, a recurring question is why anyone becomes a part of such systems.
Amanda Taub explores intriguing research that offers an unexpected perspective. The study suggests that mediocre employees often propel autocratic regimes.
An autocrat, regardless of skill, cannot govern independently. For example, Vladimir Putin relies on loyal Russian oligarchs. Iran depends on the Revolutionary Guards. Viktor Orban developed Hungary’s “electoral autocracy” with support from a select group of judges, enforcers, and business leaders.
Understanding these dynamics reveals the importance of individuals beneath the top leaders in executing policies, even those involving questionable practices.

Trump’s Use of Public Funds for Political Ads Sparks Controversy
Dennis Hastert’s Legacy: From Political Leader to Controversy
Tensions Within the Trump Administration Highlighted by Policy Reversals
Democrats Hold Advantage Before Midterms, But Voter Sentiment Is Complex
Democrats Strategize As Midterm Elections Approach
Mary Peltola Emerges as Leading Candidate in Alaska Senate Race