Journalists often focus on national leaders, who guide their country’s actions and must be accountable. However, the individuals executing their plans are equally crucial. In autocratic regimes, where state actions can involve intimidation or worse, a recurring question is why anyone becomes a part of such systems.
Amanda Taub explores intriguing research that offers an unexpected perspective. The study suggests that mediocre employees often propel autocratic regimes.
An autocrat, regardless of skill, cannot govern independently. For example, Vladimir Putin relies on loyal Russian oligarchs. Iran depends on the Revolutionary Guards. Viktor Orban developed Hungary’s “electoral autocracy” with support from a select group of judges, enforcers, and business leaders.
Understanding these dynamics reveals the importance of individuals beneath the top leaders in executing policies, even those involving questionable practices.
Former Senator Kyrsten Sinema’s Relationship Sparks Legal Case 
DNC Plan to Elevate Voices of Black and Latino Voters 
Clay Travis Discusses Trump’s Teleprompter Operator and Insider Trading Allegations 
Generational Decline in Trust and Increasing Contempt in the U.S. 
Clarence Thomas Shares Views on Race and Politics 
Maryland Tax Court Rejects State’s Digital Advertising Tax