Journalists often focus on national leaders, who guide their country’s actions and must be accountable. However, the individuals executing their plans are equally crucial. In autocratic regimes, where state actions can involve intimidation or worse, a recurring question is why anyone becomes a part of such systems.
Amanda Taub explores intriguing research that offers an unexpected perspective. The study suggests that mediocre employees often propel autocratic regimes.
An autocrat, regardless of skill, cannot govern independently. For example, Vladimir Putin relies on loyal Russian oligarchs. Iran depends on the Revolutionary Guards. Viktor Orban developed Hungary’s “electoral autocracy” with support from a select group of judges, enforcers, and business leaders.
Understanding these dynamics reveals the importance of individuals beneath the top leaders in executing policies, even those involving questionable practices.

Maine Senate Race Reveals Struggles for Democratic Candidate Graham Platner
Supreme Court’s Recent Decisions and Reactions
Supreme Court Strikes Down Campaign Finance Limits
Supreme Court Blocks Trump’s Birthright Citizenship Order
Assessment of Trump’s Agreement with Iran and Its Implications
Supreme Court Upholds State Laws Barring Transgender Female Athletes